The change of form after that first, traumatic term, meant that instead of the amiable, but ineffectual, Mr Spruce, I had my first encounter with the legendary A.W. (Bill) Haddon, our French teacher and form master. My first impression was very positive, although that changed over the next year. He was a burly man, in early middle age, with a bold, if somewhat shapeless, moustache, and attired in a careless assemblage of cords and tweed. He was a forceful, manly type, and spoke to us in a direct, open way that I suspect most of us had never encountered before: to a class of twelve year olds, he was an awesome figure, and he knew it.
Haddon taught us French, and rather well as I remember it; but he taught me more than he realised, and became a mentor for me of the dark side of authoritarian mentality, as others later taught me the opposite. He first made me aware of the facade that some people erect to hide their true nature, and where I had initially been in awe of him, I later came to despise him. He was a man's man, with a dominating personality that made him a hero on the sports field, and lord of all he surveyed in the classroom. He was a swashbuckling cricketer, and a terror on the hockey field, as I learned from friends who took up what I considered to be essentially a girl's pastime: in my view, those that couldn't play football, played hockey, and I've had two close friends in my life that have lost an eye at that ludicrous pastime; too high a toll for my taste. Apart from this occupational hazard, playing hockey with Haddon also produced further discomfort in the delight he took in targeting bare, skinny ankles with either his stick, or the hard wooden ball. I never experienced this sadistic behaviour, but friends of mine who did, told me they spent most of the game keeping out of his way. He would probably have said he was making a man of them, but my experience of him was that his real instinct was deeper and less commendable.
His nature was to be in charge, in control, and dominating a class of twelve and thirteen year old children gave him that illusion, an illusion he could not see disturbed. He never liked me I suspect, because, even in that first year, I would not conform, and never took him, or the school seriously. His remarks on my report card suggest that I had begun to get under his skin: "Fair - in an indolent sort of way"; "He might be driven, but he cannot be persuaded to work hard", this from the second year when my results were finally improving. He left his attempt to crush me until the next year; first he had to deal with another free spirit who refused to bow to his authority.
David Palmer, invariably called "bugle" for no known reason, was an urchin, an imp, a chuckling, joking bundle of energy who took nothing seriously, and enlivened any gathering he came into contact with, especially our class, much to the chagrin of Haddon, whose authority was compromised by Palmer's ebullience. Palmer would not take orders, and never listened to advice, and his self confidence was unshakeable, with occasional disastrous results. He had a mop of wiry brown hair, that he grew very long at the front, which meant that his face was usually obscured by unkempt spirals, that he was forever flicking back, to the major annoyance of more than one master. He had been told at metalwork class that his hair was too long and he must cut it, but David never listened to advice, and so continued to let it flop forward, until one day among the whirr of drills, and general banging of metal, we were all stopped in our tracks by a frantic yelling and wailing from David's side of the room. His hair had again flopped forward, but this time had become caught in the drill and dragged his head down into the danger area. The master quickly retrieved the situation by turning off the machine, and then taking great delight in chopping off a large chunk of floppy hair so that David could stand up again. David was shaken, but not stirred, and soon recovered his spirits, and in time, his long hair.
David was a friend of mine, and with others we would often play in the waste ground at the top of Wellington Lane, as his grandmother owned a sweetshop at the corner of West Pottergate and Wellington Lane. He could be very annoying with his relentless jokes and excitement, and was not averse to causing trouble, as when he told tales to Haddon that got me my first caning, but despite that, we didn't hold grudges for long, and he was usually fun to be around. Unless, of course, you had a facade of authority that you could not let slip, and in this respect the uncontrollable spirit of David Palmer was a challenge that A.W. Haddon had to take on.
On the day in question, Haddon was taking us for French, and I found myself sitting at the front of the class, beside David Palmer, and directly in front of Haddon. David was unusually quiet that day , and when I asked why, he said he wasn't well, he had a sore throat and felt ill. During the lesson he kept a small packet of fruit sweets at the front of his desk, and from time to time took one, and popped it into his mouth. Haddon finally spotted this, and asked him what he was doing. "I've got a sore throat Sir, I don't feel well" David said, quietly and apologetically. "You can't eat sweets in class, you know better than that, bring them up here." David plaintively protested "But my throat is sore Sir, they make it feel better. My Mum gave them to me, and said to have them when my throat hurts." Haddon's voice was very calm, but implacable "I'll decide what you do in this classroom Palmer, now bring them up here." David would usually have protested at the unfairness of it, but seemed to have no spirit left, and obviously had no choice but to comply. He got up slowly and gave the packet to Haddon, then came back to his seat with a defeated droop to his shoulders. Haddon placed the sweets prominently at the front of his desk, and continued with the lesson. A few moments later I was startled to hear a snuffle beside me, and I turned to find David, the irrepressible, unsinkable David, with his head in his hands, quietly crying. Nobody in the class had ever seen David down before, but we studiously ignored his despair, and continued with our work. I was at the front however, and looked up to see Haddon's reaction, and more than fifty years later I'm still appalled at what I saw. Haddon was staring at David, and his face was suffused with a serene glow of satisfaction, as he leaned back in his chair, and quietly breathed, almost to himself: "At last - we've got him". I was only twelve, but I knew then, and am even more sure now, that for a grown man to take such pleasure in breaking the spirit of a sick boy, was obscene. Haddon was a bully who bolstered his self esteem by dominating people who couldn't fight back; he displayed an affable, gregarious persona to the world, but I had briefly seen the mask slip, and what I saw behind it was something very small.
It was sometime in the next year that I had my own run in with Haddon, and again, it was due to his need to be seen as the dominant figure in any gathering, and in control. There was only one voice to be listened to in his classroom, and when somebody like myself began to attract a following, he was galvanised into defensive action.
During my second year with Hadon I had been involved in an unfortunate accident that reflected badly on my common sense, but was no more sinister than that. I had been cycling back from speedway at The Firs late on Saturday night with my best friend Woody, when we came to the crossroads half way down Mile Cross Road. We said goodbye as he turned right across the road into Margaret Paston Avenue, and I continued down the hill. I hadn’t gone many yards when I heard a loud crash to my right, and turned to see a motorcycle sliding into the gutter. I stopped as it came to a halt, and went back up the hill to look down Margaret Paston Avenue to see if Woody had seen it, but he was out of sight. I stayed a few moments, but as a number of people were gathering, I carried on home, and thought no more of it.
It wasn’t until I got to school on Monday that I became aware of the full enormity of the incident: as Woody had turned across the road on that fateful Saturday night, he had been hit by the motorcycle and knocked unconscious into the gutter. It was a dark night and I had been concentrating on the motorcyclist, and not registered at the time, the dark shape next to him. Woody was in hospital, still unconscious, and was to remain there for some weeks, although he made a full recovery, and our friendship was never affected. I have to admit that I foolishly, but typically, made much of the incident in relating the horrific crash to eager listeners, even though I hadn’t really seen it, and as a result the event was much talked about for a week or more. In retrospect, my failure to realise what had happened during those few seconds seems extraordinarily obtuse; but at the time, and remembering it now with perfect clarity, I never for a moment suspected the truth.
A week or so after the event, when the story had more or less run out of steam, we had a lesson with Haddon, and towards the end he developed a reflective mood, and began to talk in a discursive way about where our lives might lead us. We settled back, happy to be relieved of work, as he talked of friendship and loyalty, morality and civic duty, and the enduring strengths that underlie our society. It seemed to be going nowhere until he began to relate an anecdote about the lack of courage shown by those who reject responsibility, and he illustrated his point by relating the story of someone who would callously leave a friend lying injured in the street, and walk away because they couldn’t be bothered to help; the kind of selfish and cowardly behaviour that we should all be ashamed of condoning. By this time the atmosphere in the class was electric: although he never mentioned my name or looked my way, we knew he was talking about me, and quite blatantly accusing me of deliberately leaving Woody to his fate. The class finally broke up, with a lot of chatter about what he had said, and what I would do about it. I said he wouldn’t get away with it, but left it at that, until I got home and told my Father what had happened. He was appalled at the story and promised to do something about it: he wrote a letter to Haddon condemning his accusations, and demanding that he immediately retract them, or he would be receiving a letter from our solicitor; and knowing Dad, and his enormous range of contacts, I’m sure he did have a solicitor somewhere.
The letter was duly written, in Dad’s neat, legible hand, and forcefully and articulately set out his position. I took it to school next day and there was a huge sense of anticipation when I told the class what was going to happen. I placed it prominently on Haddon’s desk, and we all sat down to await his arrival and reaction. He swept into the room in his usual imperious manner, and sat at his desk, glancing at the letter, and then looking away. He must have sensed the atmosphere, and knew the cause, but he was too experienced an operator to give us any satisfaction, and so he studiously ignored the letter for the rest of the day, enjoying our seething frustration. At the end of the afternoon he dismissed the class and asked me to stay behind.
When we were alone he read the letter, studied it, and paused before speaking. For the next half an hour he treated me to a discursive ramble on the nature of intellectual discussion, and how it was not wise to take too literally what were meant to be illustrations of philosophical constructs; despite my already impressive vocabulary, he threw in the odd esoteric technical term that I wasn’t familiar with, and which forced me to ask for clarification, no doubt to emphasise how out of my depth I was at this level. He never directly mentioned the particular incident that was the cause of the dispute, but he reiterated that no interpretation of a personal, or specific nature should be inferred from what were completely neutral references to illustrate abstract propositions. And so he went on, churning out this farrago of convoluted, self justifying nonsense, as he sought to convince me that I had misinterpreted what had been a perfectly reasonable, mature discussion, and which was perhaps, by implication, over my head. This was all done in a quiet, friendly, man-to-man kind of way that was intended to disarm me, and at the end I’m sure he was content with his performance, but I wasn’t buying it. I left without saying much, and said I would report what he had said to my Father.
My Father didn’t buy it either, and we discussed what to do. We decided that to take it further would be pointless, and only prolong the story; Haddon had not had the courage to apologise in private, nor justify himself in public, but he had in effect withdrawn the accusation, albeit obliquely, and it was pretty certain he would never bring up the subject again. We felt that we had forced him to back down; he knew it and we knew it, and the fact that he had done it in a devious, dishonest way, only reinforced our contempt for him. We decided to accept a moral victory, rather than prolong a destructive war, and so let the matter drop. The next day I told the others that he had withdrawn the accusation, and he would never mention it again, which proved to be the case. Whether because of this or not I don’t know, but I never had any trouble with Haddon again, and at the end of the year moved to another form, which meant I had no more contact with him for the rest of my school career.
Although Haddon dominated my first two years at school, due to being my form master for four of the six terms, most of the masters were not particularly significant, although there were other bizarre characters who crossed my path.